Week 3 | Session 4: Kraljic Matrix — Quadrant Strategies & Applications

Course: Supply Chain Digitization

---

Quick Recap — Session 3

Note

• Kraljic Matrix introduced: Two dimensions — Profit Impact (Y-axis) and Supply Risk (X-axis)
• Supply portfolio = all items and services procured (not the suppliers themselves)
• Procurement strategy can be defined at the organisational level or at an individual facility level

---

Two Ways to Use the Kraljic Matrix

Proactive vs. Corrective Use

1. Starting Fresh — New Business or New Procurement Setup

• No history of procurement yet
• Use the matrix to anticipate potential profit impact and supply risk
• Build a proactive strategy before issues arise

2. Reviewing Existing Strategy — Established Organisation

• Organisation has been operating 10–15 years and faces procurement problems — missed orders, supplier failures, cost overruns, or procured items no longer fitting well and impacting downstream client relationships

1. Categorise all currently procured items into the four Kraljic quadrants
2. Identify what targeted interventions are needed per category
3. Execute the strategy changes — supplier development, substitutions, renegotiations, or decentralisation

Tip

★ Exam Tip: Know both uses — proactive (new business) vs. corrective (existing organisation). Always state: “Segmentation first, then strategy.” The matrix is a classification tool before it is a decision tool.

---

Reading the Kraljic Matrix — Axis Interpretation

X-Axis: Profit Impact →

Position	Meaning	Measurement Tools
Right (High)	Items contributing a large percentage of total purchase value (30–40%) — expensive, high-spend items	Spend analysis, ABC analysis, VED analysis
Left (Low)	Cheaper items representing a smaller share of total purchase spend	Same tools applied at lower thresholds

Y-Axis: Supply Risk ↑

Position	Meaning	Example
Top (High risk)	Few suppliers, distant suppliers, perishable items, or highly unique specifications	An item with only 1 global supplier → very high risk
Bottom (Low risk)	Many suppliers, local availability, easy substitutability	An item with 1,000 available suppliers → very low risk

---

The Four Quadrants — Characteristics & Strategies

Non-Critical — Low Risk + Low Cost

Ideal Quadrant

Attribute	Detail
Supply risk	Low — many suppliers, easy substitutability
Profit impact	Low — cheap items, small share of spend
Nature	Standardised, highly available
Challenge	Appears ideal but is rare in practice — monopolies can temporarily create this state, but competitors enter and suppliers split across clients, so risk rises again

Strategy: Automate and decentralise purchasing. Spot purchases from local market are acceptable — prices are well-defined and competition among suppliers limits price volatility.

Note

★ Why can’t all items be Non-Critical? The monopoly scenario that creates a “low risk, cheap item” is short-lived. As demand grows, competitors enter the market, suppliers split their capacity across multiple clients, and risk inevitably rises. Non-Critical is a temporary state, not a permanent position.

---

Bottleneck — High Risk + Low Cost

Supply Continuity Risk

Attribute	Detail
Supply risk	High — few suppliers, distant, unique specifications, or perishable
Profit impact	Low — the item itself is not expensive
Core threat	Supply disruption — even though the item is cheap, its unavailability can halt production
Buyer position	Weak — limited alternatives

Strategy: Secure supply continuity through buffer stock, alternative supplier development, or substitute identification.

---

Leverage — Low Risk + High Cost

Buyer's Opportunity

Attribute	Detail
Supply risk	Low — many supplier options exist in the market
Profit impact	High — expensive items representing a significant share of spend
Buyer position	Strong — multiple suppliers competing for the business gives the buyer negotiating power

Strategy: Actively exploit purchasing power through competitive bidding, volume optimisation, and price negotiation.

---

Strategic — High Risk + High Cost

Most Critical Quadrant

Attribute	Detail
Supply risk	High — few or single global suppliers, unique or rare inputs
Profit impact	High — major share of total spend
Buyer position	Weak — supplier dominates the relationship
Supplier’s leverage	”I have the product, your competitors want it too — take it at my price or I go elsewhere”

Strategy: Long-term supplier relationships, joint ventures, or supplier acquisition. Cost reduction through negotiation alone is largely ineffective here.

---

Strategic Interventions — Reducing Supply Risk

Goal: Move Bottleneck and Strategic items towards lower-risk quadrants.

Option 1 — Add More Suppliers

Applicable: Bottleneck & Strategic

Identify and formally qualify alternative suppliers to reduce dependence on any single source. More supplier options = lower supply risk per item.

---

Option 2 — Joint Venture or Supplier Takeover

Applicable: Strategic Items

When to use: Only one supplier exists globally, the item is rare, and procurement volumes are high enough to justify the investment.

• A long-term Joint Venture (JV) or acquisition of the supplier permanently secures supply
• Removes supplier dominance — the buyer becomes a co-owner or owner of the supply source
• The most structurally permanent form of supply risk reduction

---

Option 3 — Carry Safety Stock (Buffer Inventory)

Applicable: Bottleneck Items

Why: High supply risk → late deliveries are likely → pre-purchase excess inventory to buffer against demand shocks and supply delays.

Tip

Example: A supplier is geographically distant — lead times are long and variable. The buyer procures large volumes in advance to absorb demand variability without risking a stockout.

Trade-off: Higher inventory holding cost is accepted in exchange for protecting production continuity — especially when the cost of a production halt far exceeds the cost of carrying extra stock.

---

Option 4 — Find Substitutes

Applicable: Bottleneck & Strategic

Logic: High supply risk often stems from unique specifications — a specific chemical composition, shape, or size. If a substitute can deliver the same functional output, supply risk is distributed across more items and more suppliers.

Tip

Example: A specific dye used in shampoo production has only one supplier → high risk. If an alternative dye with the same colour and sheen can be found, procurement options expand → supply risk is reduced.

Key question to ask before substitution: Is this specific attribute truly non-negotiable for the final product? If the answer is no, substitution becomes viable.

Note

★ Substitution logic: Same functional benefit → more procurement options → supply risk reduced. Substitution is not a compromise on product quality — it is a strategic reframing of the specification question.

---

Strategic Interventions — Reducing Cost

Goal: Reduce cost for Leverage and Strategic items (the high profit impact side of the matrix).

For Strategic Items — Cost Reduction is Structurally Difficult

The supplier is the dominating party — buyer negotiating power is limited.

Note

The supplier’s effective position: “I have the product, your competitors want it too — take it at my price or I look elsewhere.”

Only viable long-term option: JV or supplier takeover — which removes the power asymmetry entirely by bringing the supplier under partial or full ownership. Short-term negotiation tactics produce minimal results in this quadrant.

For Leverage Items — Buyer Has Full Negotiating Power

Many suppliers in the market → the buyer is the dominating party. Three cost reduction tactics apply:

Tactic	Mechanism
Enable supplier competition	Invite competitive bids and tenders → drives prices down through market competition
Optimise order quantity	Consolidate volumes to qualify for volume discounts
Find substitutes	If cost cannot be reduced through negotiation → identify a substitute item and exit the current supplier relationship

Tip

★ Exam Tip: Leverage items represent the buyer’s best opportunity to reduce procurement cost. Strategic items = the supplier dominates, and negotiation alone won’t work. Always pair the quadrant with the power dynamic when explaining the strategy.

---

Streamlining Procurement Transactions

Beyond risk and cost — look at how procurement is executed operationally.

E-Procurement and Automation

• Electronic procurement portals reduce the cost of searching for and connecting with suppliers
• Significant growth in e-procurement adoption across industries
• Automates routine transactions, freeing procurement teams for strategic work

Decentralisation of Purchase Decisions

Best for: Non-Critical Items

Since non-critical items carry low value and low risk, they do not require central strategic oversight.

Action: Delegate procurement authority to the relevant facility, division, or local procurement committee.

Allow: Spot purchases directly from the local market based on operational need.

Note

Why spot purchases work for Non-Critical items: Prices for these items are well-defined and transparent in the market. Suppliers cannot extract premium pricing due to competition among themselves. There is no strategic advantage in centralising this — the management bandwidth saved is better applied to Strategic and Bottleneck items.

★ Non-Critical → decentralise → spot purchases → saves senior procurement bandwidth for the quadrants that genuinely need it.

---

Direction of Movement — Ideal Strategy Goals

The ultimate goal for every item in the supply portfolio is to move it towards the Non-Critical quadrant — low risk, low cost.

Current Quadrant	Target Direction	Primary Interventions
Bottleneck	→ Non-Critical	Reduce supply risk: add suppliers, carry stock, find substitutes
Strategic	→ Leverage, then Non-Critical	Reduce risk first (JV/takeover), then reduce cost (competitive bidding)
Leverage	→ Non-Critical	Reduce cost: competitive bidding, volume optimisation, substitutes
Non-Critical	Maintain	Automate and decentralise purchasing

Note

Practical reality: Full movement to Non-Critical is rarely achievable — the nature of the product or market prevents it for many items.

Especially for Strategic items: Both supply risk and cost are structurally hard to reduce simultaneously. The realistic long-term play is a JV or supplier acquisition — not short-term negotiation. Interim strategies (safety stock, substitute research) manage the risk while the long-term structural solution is pursued.

---

Session Summary

Topic	Key Points
Two uses of Kraljic	Proactive (new business) | Corrective (existing organisation) — always segment first, then strategise
Risk reduction tools	Add suppliers | JV / Takeover | Carry safety stock | Find substitutes
Cost reduction tools	Competitive bidding (Leverage) | JV / Takeover (Strategic) | Substitutes | Optimal order quantity
Streamlining tools	E-procurement automation | Decentralised spot purchasing (Non-Critical)
Direction of movement	All quadrants → Non-Critical (ideal but rarely fully achievable)

Tip

★ Exam Tip: Always pair each quadrant’s strategy with a causal reason explaining why it is difficult or easy. Examiners want causal reasoning, not just quadrant labels.

Framework answer structure:

1. Classify the item into a quadrant (state supply risk level and profit impact)
2. State the power dynamic (buyer-dominant or supplier-dominant)
3. Recommend the strategy with the reason it fits the power dynamic
4. Acknowledge any trade-off or implementation difficulty

Next session: Numerical example — applying the Kraljic Matrix to a real case firm.