Skip to content

Capstone 4 - Closing the Project

Google Project Management Certificate · Course 6: Applying Project Management in the Real World


Week 3 ended with the tablets tested, the survey results read and the retrospective run. This final week does two things at once. It finishes the execution phase with the communication skill that execution keeps demanding, escalating a problem to someone senior, and then it walks the project across the line into the closing phase.

The order matters. A problem is only worth a senior stakeholder’s attention if you can say what it is in one or two sentences and say what it costs the organisation, which is where objectives and key results come back in. Once the fixes land and the tablets launch, closing is about documentation rather than delivery: a closeout report written for the next project manager, an impact report written for the people who funded the work, an archive that makes the whole project findable, and a proper thank you to the team.

The week closes the certificate as well as the project. The last activity turns the same closing technique on the learner, as a personal closing report on the programme itself.


Every project has problems, and communicating them is part of the project manager’s job. Most are small enough to settle inside the immediate project team. Occasionally one has to be escalated to a senior stakeholder, together with a proposed solution, so they can give input and guidance on the next step.

The core principle: a stakeholder should never have to open several project documents or chase multiple email threads to work out what the problem is. Pulling the relevant pieces together is the project manager’s responsibility, not theirs.

When deciding what belongs in a one to two sentence overview, ask: how can I communicate a decision in a way that makes it easy for them to decide?

Sending a link to the project plan and pointing at the overdue rows fails that test, because it gives no understanding of what the problem actually is.

Several sourcesemails, meeting notes, presentations, the project plan
One or two sentencesthe problem stated plainly, with the cause
A line of organisational impactwhich OKR this puts at risk
A named decisionthe recommendation, and what happens if it is not taken
The shape of an escalation. Every layer exists so the stakeholder can decide without reading anything else.

Five tasks in the plan are overdue because of supplier delays, and the slippage may reach the final deliverable. Solutions have already been explored. The summary given:

A number of tasks have run past their due date because of supplier issues, so we recommend hiring a second supplier to hit the deliverable date. Otherwise we will need to push the launch date back.

That gives the stakeholder three usable options: agree with the solution, disagree with it, or offer one of their own. Any of the three counts as success, because the project manager’s role was to communicate the problem and propose a solution, not to be right.

Chris is a program manager at Google working on Search, building features for millions of users across many surfaces, languages and information needs. His view is blunt: problem solving is the single most important thing program managers do, because it is the job.

Scope problems - work moving out of scope, or scope growing or shrinkingBudget problems - too little funding, or too muchPeople problems - too few, too many, or the wrong skill setsTimeline problems

His loop is four moves: identify the problem, build a framework for it from your tools, processes and methodologies, propose a solution, and get buy-in for it. The only way to get buy-in is to put something organised and principled in front of people.

  • Always hunt the root cause. What you are experiencing is usually a red herring, an outcome of something underneath. Debugging the underlying systemic, process, tooling or technical issue is the first step, not the last.
  • The decision is the outcome. Once you understand the problem well enough, assembling an objective plan from those inputs is how you actually reach a decision.
  • The artifacts are not the job. Charters, scope documents, meeting notes and trackers feel like the job, but they are mechanisms and tools. The real job is running scope and programmes, convincing people, driving organisational change and solving strategic initiatives.
  • Build the skill anywhere. If you have not yet had big problems to work on, hobbies, building a piece of software for yourself or a friend, or a passion in another industry all supply real problems to solve. Every industry and business has them.

The first activity asked for a one to two sentence overview of a problem affecting the Sauce and Spoon tablet pilot, synthesised from the week’s supporting materials rather than lifted from any single one of them. The course flags that this summary is not a throwaway: it gets reused inside the escalation email written two activities later.


OKRs were introduced earlier in the programme; this week revisits them specifically as a lever for getting a problem taken seriously.

Sauce and Spoon example
ObjectivePrioritise customer needs and wants
Key resultAddress feedback from customer reviews within 24 hours
Testing whether a project deserves to exist
  • If a project and its goals contribute to the organisation’s wider OKRs, that is a good sign it is relevant and worth the time and money
  • At Google, every project, large or small, aims to contribute tangibly to organisation-wide OKRs
  • Struggling to explain how a project helps reach an OKR is a strong signal to re-evaluate the project altogether
Getting a problem onto a senior agenda
  • Naming the specific OKRs a problem threatens makes clear why it must be addressed
  • It also explains why the problem is worth that person’s attention at all
  • Senior stakeholders have a great deal to focus on beyond your project, so an OKR link is what catches limited attention

OKRs work as a shared language across an organisation, which is exactly why they travel well upwards.

The second activity fine-tuned the problem summary from the first by adding one sentence explaining how the issue jeopardises Sauce and Spoon’s organisational objectives. The two objectives the video points at are running an efficient, profitable business model, and prioritising customer needs. Being able to identify a problem’s effect on the organisation’s OKRs is what lets you set and communicate the right level of risk and urgency.


If an issue is big enough to escalate, it is an issue you want resolved quickly, so email is the tool: fast to send, and able to ask for a specific decision. The risk is being ignored.

  1. Start from what matters to them. Senior stakeholders are usually more interested in a problem’s potential impact on the organisation than on a single project. Make that impact clear within the first two sentences.

  2. Write a subject line that states the topic and the action. Words such as urgent, timely, decision needed or please review tell a person receiving many emails a day both what this is and what you want them to do.

  3. Keep the body brief. Outline the problem, explain how it hits organisational goals, and state the decision you need in order to proceed. Concretely: one or two sentences summarising the problem, plus one sentence on the OKR impact.

  4. Attach or link anything they need to decide, rather than making them ask for it.

  5. Proofread. Misspellings, grammatical errors and inaccurate hyperlinks all cost credibility. Use the spellcheck and grammar tools available to you.

Laura is an executive productivity advisor at Google, coaching executives one to one on time management, meeting management, effective email, communication and organisation. Her material is the counterpart to the email best practices: how to shape communication around a particular person.

  • Concise for an executive, detailed for a teammate. When summarising for an executive, isolate the absolutely important information they need to see.
  • Do the homework before you write. Ask their executive assistant, or someone who has worked with them, what their preferred communication style is, what kinds of presentation they like, and what information they typically need in order to decide. That preparation matters most when your window with them is short.
  • Expect stakeholders to differ. She worked with two managers on one project: one was talkative, loved brainstorming and wanted frequent meetings to hash out every detail; the other was the complete opposite. The same information and the same decision have to be tailored per person.
  • Anticipate the five questions. Before presenting, work out the five questions the stakeholder is likely to ask and keep that detail ready in an appendix, so their time is used well.
  • Arrive with proposed solutions. Not what should I do, but I think we should do A, though B and C are also options, what do you think. It gives them a starting point and shows you have done the background work and understand the problem.
  • Put a TLDR at the top. Too long, did not read: the one sentence they need from the email. Variants that do the same work are an update on project A, need decision, action requested, or deadline by. It tells them what is coming before they read it.
  • Make the body scannable. Bullets, bolding and highlighting for what must stand out, the ask reiterated at the end, deadlines stated, links and attachments included, so someone skimming or re-reading later still has everything needed to reply.

The third activity applied all of the above by composing an email to a stakeholder of the Sauce and Spoon tablet pilot. The problem summary written in the first activity and the OKR sentence added in the second became the body of that email, with a subject line signalling the action required.


The phase reading is a set of guiding questions and tips compiled by dozens of project managers at Google. Its argument for thoroughness is risk avoidance: a project closed properly protects you, the team and the organisation from later trouble.

Assurance onethe work
All work has been completednothing is left half finished and quietly assumed to be somebody else’s problem
Assurance twothe process
All agreed project management processes have been executedincluding the ones nobody enjoys, such as procurement
Assurance threethe recognition
Everyone involved formally recognises the project is completeclosure is a shared, stated fact, not an inference from the calendar
  • Conduct administrative closure of the procurement process.
  • Run a formal closing process after the final project phase or milestone.
  • Complete and present an impact report.
  • Document acceptance from all stakeholders, confirming they are happy with the deliverables and outcomes.
  • Formally disband and thank the project team.

The retrospective itself was Week 3’s material, but the closing reading adds four facilitation tips worth carrying into the final one.

TipWhy it works
Create a safe space for people to share experiences and feedbackHonest input only arrives where it is safe to give
Model the behaviour and responses you want from the teamThe facilitator sets the tone before anyone else speaks
Phrase questions non-confrontationallyInstead of what went wrong and what went well, ask what we should start, stop and continue
Remind the team of the milestones they reachedRecalling the whole arc of the project sparks far more discussion than starting from a blank page

Peta, the project manager, has taken the tablets through quality standards and launched them. Molly Edwards is the project manager taking on the next round of rollouts, and the week’s email thread is the handover conversation: Molly asks for highlights ahead of a debrief lunch, and Peta answers before writing her closeout and personal closing reports.

The pilot responses were shaky, and the launch results come from what was changed afterwards.

Problem seen in the pilotFix appliedResult at launch
Guests struggled with tablet navigationSwitched to a simpler layoutGuests found the new layout much easier
Table turn time objective not being metWorked with the general managers, trained waitstaff to be aware of guest pacingTurn time reduced by 30 minutes, so table waits shortened too
Confusion over paymentClearer messaging that tablets take cards only, plus a streamlined path for guests paying cashCheckout time held at one minute or less
Glitchy tablets in serviceNew pre-service testing checklistFewer than 5 percent of customers reporting technical issues each week, hitting the standard
GoalTargetAchieved
Average check totalRaise from 65 to 75 dollarsMet by the end of Q2
Appetiser sales lift15 percent15 percent average across the pilot locations, 10 percent North and 20 percent Downtown
Table turn timeReduce by 30 minutesMet, after the pacing training
Daily guest countUp 10 percent10 percent overall, and 20 percent at Downtown, double the target
Food wasteCut by 25 percentMet
Tablet checkout timeOne minute or lessHeld
Technical issuesUnder 5 percent of guests per weekMet
Order accuracy98 percentStill short. Surveys showed guests were still receiving incorrect orders

Alex drove the turn time reduction with the Downtown waitstaff. Gilly is adapting to the new way of working and stays focused on the guest experience. Carter and the kitchen remained the open issue: the survey evidence on incorrect orders led to a direct conversation about examining every possible source of error, kitchen staff included, framed around the shared goal of a great customer experience.


Before a project manager can call a project complete, there is a closeout report to write. It is a compilation exercise as much as a reflection: every link and every document gathered in one place, a practice the course calls good project hygiene.

  • Confirms the project is done and summarises deliverables, success metrics, feedback, lessons learned and next steps.
  • Serves as a reference document for the organisation, so that a follow-up or similar project starts with the artifacts already assembled.
  • Reflects on the team’s performance and helps the team verify that every task was actually completed.
  • Finalises the team’s efforts so people can move on to new projects and tasks, with everyone satisfied with the work done.
  • Increases the impact of the work by communicating it to people who were not closely involved.

A closeout report is a document created by project managers for project managers: future project managers, and anyone interested in the project’s elements and artifacts. The reading describes it as a blueprint of what the team did, how they did it and what they delivered, including an evaluation of the quality of the work and of performance against budget and schedule.

The bar the video sets: someone entirely unfamiliar with the project should be able to read it and come away understanding what the project was, why it was done and how well it went. In this course it is also framed as a portfolio piece that can stand alone in front of a potential employer, demonstrating the ability to synthesise and communicate information clearly.

SectionWhat goes in it
Project summaryThe objectives, or put another way, the desired result for the project
MethodologyWhich approach the team used: Waterfall, Agile, Lean, a combination, or something else
Results: performance baselineActual against planned schedule, cost and scope, with a notes column for explaining discrepancies
Key accomplishments and outcomesWhat was achieved, as bullets
Lessons learnedWhat the team now knows that it did not before
Next stepsWhat happens after this project
Project documentation archiveLinks to the proposal, charter, plan, evaluation findings and other artifacts

The template supplies guiding questions under each section to push for enough detail, with the invitation to go further still. The purpose throughout is to compile and archive the most important aspects of the project.

The template arrived with the performance baseline table already filled from the project record, and with the narrative sections empty. The planned against actual comparison is the heart of it:

BaselinePlannedActualNote
ScheduleLaunch on 23 AprilLaunched on 23 AprilHit the intended day, but tasks had to be accelerated because of earlier delays
Cost: training materials and fees10,000 dollars7,486 dollarsWell under
Cost: hardware and software across locations3,500 dollars3,600 dollars annuallyMarginally over
Cost: maintenance and IT fees5,000 dollars0 dollarsIncluded with the hardware order subscription
Cost: website and menu redesign5,000 dollars4,250 dollarsUnder
Cost: other customisation550 dollars578 dollarsMarginally over
ScopeInstall tablets at two locations, launch at the start of Q2, create a staff training planTablets installed by an electrician at two locations, menus and coupons and branding loaded, integrated with the POS system, vendor timing renegotiated, training plan created, waitstaff expectations managed, back and front of house trained, maintenance and locking system created, customer satisfaction surveying implementedThe number of moving pieces was badly underestimated

Overall the budget was very nearly matched. The scope row is the instructive one: three planned lines expanded into roughly a dozen delivered lines, which is the discrepancy the notes column exists for.

The sections I completed described the pilot and rollout across the bar sections of the North and Downtown locations, with the aim of speeding up service, increasing product mix and generating operational data in support of the company’s growth and expansion OKRs. The methodology recorded was a hybrid: a traditional Waterfall life cycle for initiation, planning and closeout, with execution layering in an iterative test, feedback and adjust loop built from the friends and family pilot, the customer survey and the team retrospective. Key accomplishments repeated the goals-against-results table above. The documentation archive listed the project proposal, the charter, the project plan, the test launch findings presentation, the stakeholder analysis and the retrospective review.


The impact report and the executive summary

Section titled “The impact report and the executive summary”

Impact reporting sits next to the closeout report and answers a different question for a different audience: what value did this add?

Closeout report
  • Audience - future project managers, and anyone interested in the details
  • Form - a detailed document
  • Purpose - a blueprint of what was done, how, and what was delivered
  • Content - summary, methodology, results, lessons learned, next steps, documentation archive
  • Tone - complete and evaluative, including quality, budget and schedule performance
Impact report
  • Audience - senior stakeholders and project sponsors who were not in the day-to-day
  • Form - usually a presentation guided by a deck
  • Purpose - show the value that the project added
  • Content - executive summary, results, what worked, next steps
  • Tone - a highlight reel, told with storytelling, data and visualisations
Improve the service
  • Analysing the results is what lets you adapt and improve what you offer
Motivate people
  • Celebrating achievements motivates both staff and senior stakeholders
Build credibility
  • Trust with supporters, sponsors, funders and everyone who benefits from the project
Spread the learning
  • Lessons shared with similar organisations, not kept inside one team

The closing reading adds the delivery advice: invite key stakeholders and senior leadership to the presentation, and amplify the outcome beyond that room by taking it to a company all-hands, a newsletter, or a meeting with another team that could use the lessons.

The test to apply: if an executive had time to read nothing but this, would they understand the project highlights? It should answer how effectively the project was delivered and what was learned from it, while being neither overloaded with detail nor so general as to be vague.

Two pieces of practical advice. First, review the SMART goals, the business case and the project charter before writing, because they point at the aspects that matter most and are usually tied to the key accomplishments. Second, write the executive summary last: draft the results, what worked and next steps slides first, in detail and with graphs and images, and the highlights become easy to lift out.

Three elements belong in it:

ElementThe question it answers
Project visionWhat was the purpose, and what need is the project fulfilling?
Key accomplishmentsWhich activities, tasks and milestones produced the success? What are the main highlights, what value was added, did profitability improve?
Lessons learnedWhat could be improved, and how will future processes change for the better?

The video builds a summary for an imaginary app that automatically moves money from a user’s checking account into a designated savings account twice a month, with the amount set by an algorithm using the checking balance at the time of withdrawal plus other variables such as deposit frequency.

  • Vision - help users get ahead financially through an algorithm-based automatic deposit system that pulls money into savings.
  • Key accomplishments - in the run-up to launch, 1,000 beta users saved over 300,000 dollars in six months, which proved the use case and the need.
  • Financial highlight - at 3 dollars per user per month, 1,000 users over six months netted 18,000 dollars.
  • Lessons learned - beta testers mainly wanted more frequent updates about when their money was being transferred, so that goes into the update.

Activity: write the impact report executive summary

Section titled “Activity: write the impact report executive summary”

The template arrived as a deck with everything except the summary already built, so that the shape of a typical impact report was visible before writing.

SlideContent supplied
TitleSauce and Spoon tablet rollout impact report
Executive summaryBlank, the task
Customer satisfaction: pilotPie chart of the post-pilot survey, 72 percent rating their tablet experience 4 or 5 out of 5
Customer satisfaction: launchPie chart of the post-launch survey, 86 percent rating 4 or 5, described in the deck as a 14 percent increase
RevenueRevenue chart marked with the 23 April launch, July running up to 20 percent above April
What worked: key accomplishmentsFour themes, each with two supporting lines: decreased table turn time, decreased food waste, increased customer satisfaction, increased sales
Next steps: looking forwardA table of initiative, action and date
AppendixA link to all resources

The next steps table on that slide names three initiatives:

InitiativeActionDate
Roll tablets out to more locationsCreate a new project plan for installation at the new locationsQ2
Keep tracking customer experience and satisfactionContinue surveying and gathering data by various meansOngoing
Expand tablet featuresInvestigate additions such as social media integration, reservations and videoQ4

The summary I wrote follows the three-element structure: the vision of speeding up service, lifting average check value and modernising the guest experience across two pilot locations in support of the growth and expansion OKRs; two accomplishments, the satisfaction rise from 72 to 86 percent after the post-pilot fixes and the steady revenue climb with July around 20 percent above April, alongside the turn time, food waste and guest count results; two lessons, that the original tablet interface was too complex and needed earlier usability testing with more guests, and that cross-functional issues such as order accuracy needed joint fixes rather than tickets assigned owner by owner; and two next steps, the rollout to the remaining locations under Molly Edwards and continued work towards the 98 percent order accuracy target.


The last item on the closing checklist is to formally disband and thank the team, and the reading treats celebration as a real project management task rather than a nicety. Celebrations help a team feel recognised and rewarded for the work, and the form should suit the project and the company.

Publicise the successful outcome inside the companyRequest a speaking slot at a team or company all-hands to spotlight the project and the teamOrganise a celebration event for the project teamRecognise individual contributions through awards or superlativesUse the employee recognition programmes your organisation already runs

Documenting and organising the project’s components serves the same end from the other direction: it provides visibility and accountability, and project team members and senior stakeholders reference and contribute to project documents throughout the work, not only at the end.


The final activity applies the same closing discipline to the learner rather than the project. The course calls it personal closing reporting: reflecting on completing the certificate exactly as you would reflect on a delivered project, using the retrospective and closeout habits built through the programme.

  1. List your key accomplishments. Look back to the start of the programme: what challenges did you overcome? Concepts you doubted you would ever understand and then did. Difficulties in your personal life you worked around. Fitting the course in alongside a full-time job counts as a major win.

  2. Reflect on lessons learned. A busy week where a lesson got less attention than it deserved. Discovering which parts you enjoyed, such as stakeholder management, and which you enjoyed less, such as budgeting and procurement.

  3. Decide next steps for the career. Contacting recruiting companies, asking a current manager for more responsibility, refreshing a resume, setting a target of applying to a number of project management jobs per week.

  4. Put the goals on a timeline as if they were part of a project you were managing, because project management applies to everyday life as much as to work.

  5. Write your own executive summary last: your experience of the programme as a whole, your successes, and how you plan to advance in project management.

SectionWhat it holds
Executive summaryThe programme experience as a whole, written to feel inspiring rather than dutiful
Key accomplishmentsChallenges overcome and wins worth noting, including small ones such as a strong quiz score or applying a concept to something outside work
Lessons learnedWhat you would do differently, and what you discovered you like and dislike
Next stepsConcrete career moves
GoalsFour timeframes: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 5 years

The framing at the end is that the report is a project artifact to keep and look back on, and that finishing the certificate deserves the same treatment you would give a team at the end of a project: celebrate the successes, then keep growing and improving.


The closing video walks the whole capstone back through the project life cycle, which doubles as a map of the four weeks.

Initiationproject charter, project goals and deliverables, stakeholder analysis to prepare for negotiation
Planningdetermining the tasks that achieve the goals, team brainstorms so nothing is missed, techniques for accurate time estimates
Executionexecuting tasks, quality management, setting quality standards and measuring quality with user surveys
Closingconnecting problems to project goals through OKRs, the closeout report, impact reporting and the executive summary
The capstone in one line: one project taken end to end, with the documentation produced at each stage becoming a portfolio.

The stated payoff of finishing is not only the knowledge but the portfolio of work produced along the way, which is showable to potential employers.



Next: AI for project management → - where generative AI actually helps a project manager.